乌克兰首次承认「冲突早就能结束，但西方让我们继续打」，透露出了什么信息？

又到了看观察者网如何制造假消息环节。

采访的视频链接油管可见，我这边只是照抄《乌克兰真理报》的英文版。

观察者网此次依然使用了“一小部分真实内容+一大部分自己瞎编乱造”的风格，

（观察者网讯）据《乌克兰真理报》11月24日报道，乌克兰执政党“人民公仆”议会党团主席阿拉哈米亚（David Arakhamia）当天表示，俄罗斯去年3月曾承诺，若乌克兰保持中立且不加入北约，俄罗斯便停火。拉哈米亚称，出于对俄罗斯的不信任，以及英国时任首相约翰逊的反对，乌克兰最终选择继续战斗。

这里的

俄罗斯去年3月曾承诺，若乌克兰保持中立且不加入北约，俄罗斯便停火。

我们可以拉一下原文，这部分大体上是真实的。

According to Putin, there were 18 articles in the so-called agreement On the Permanent Neutrality of Ukraine and Security Guarantees, where "everything is spelled out, from military equipment to personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine," and allegedly the document was signed by the head of the Ukrainian delegation.

Arakhamiia stressed: "For some reason, Putin did not publish this document. Why do you think? If he had such a document, he would have made it public."

Quote: "They really hoped almost to the last moment that they would force us to sign such an agreement so that we would take neutrality. It was the most important thing for them. They were prepared to end the war if we agreed to, – as Finland once did, – neutrality, and committed that we would not join NATO.

而观察者搞了大新闻的，则是

拉哈米亚称，出于对俄罗斯的不信任，以及英国时任首相约翰逊的反对，乌克兰最终选择继续战斗。

这一段话有没有原文呢？有的。

When asked why Ukraine did not agree to this point, Arakhamia replied that there was no confidence in the Russians, because they were ready to promise anything.

Quote: "First, in order to agree to this point, it is necessary to change the Constitution. Our path to NATO is written in the Constitution.

Secondly, there was no confidence in the Russians that they would do it. This could only be done if there were security guarantees. We could not sign something, step away, everyone would relax there, and then they would [invade] even more prepared – because they have, in fact, gone in unprepared for such a resistance. Therefore, we could only explore this route when there is absolute certainty that this will not happen again. There is no such certainty.

Moreover, when we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kyiv and said that we would not sign anything with them at all, and let's just fight."

观察者网根据最后一段文字进行了发挥，说

在此之前，乌克兰媒体和美国陆军退役上校均曾爆料称，约翰逊破坏了俄乌结束冲突的努力，但乌方从未予以承认。“今日俄罗斯”（RT）称，阿拉哈米亚是首个证实此事件真实性的乌克兰官员。

然而显然，观察者网的小编们没有看到后面的内容：

Details: At the same time, Arakhamiia denied that the Ukrainian delegation was ready to sign such a document, and that Johnson forced Kyiv’s hand.

According to Arakhamiia, the delegation did not even have the legal right to sign anything – this could only theoretically happen at a meeting of Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Vladimir Putin.

Arakhamiia added that Western partners knew about the negotiations and saw drafts of documents, but did not attempt to make a decision for Ukraine, but rather gave advice.

"They actually advised us not to go into ephemeral security guarantees [with the Russians – ed.], which could not have been given at that time at all," said Arakhamiia, who headed the negotiating delegation.

In his opinion, the delegation achieved the priority tasks "by 8 points out of 10," because the Russians still "left" (retreated from Kyiv), and then everything turned into a purely military direction.

Arakhamiia admitted that there was a moment when he believed in the possibility of encirclement of the capital.

说谎成性是病，得治。