51个回答

如何评价德赛电池强迫劳动这件事情?

故事收集册
12个点赞 👍

总有人想着找洋大人告状,思路没问题,没错,但是也得找对人,找苹果?这有什么用,自己供应链的合作伙伴帮忙压低成本,人巴不得如此,屁股决定脑袋,不能高估资本家的底线,要找对人,并且作为弱势方,想要胜利就要挑动强势方的矛盾以及让某一强势方看到有利可图,这样我们作为弱势一方才能,从中获利。所以目前这个局势,哪一方可以通过该事件获利呢?

欧盟理事会

[email protected]

欧盟委员会

[email protected]

欧洲议会

[email protected]

欧洲经济和社会委员会

[email protected]

欧洲劳工局

[email protected]

欧洲工会联合会

[email protected]

欧盟刚准备全面落地EU-FLPRCSDDD,我们就给一个极好的靶子,那么只要举报邮件足够,那群无能官僚,在瞎眼也会看到,并且利用上

以下内容是正文,该发给谁,邮箱已经给出,内容给了对方哪些弹药,自行翻译。



Urgent Submission: Systemic Violations of EU Labour Rights Regulations in Desay Battery Huizhou Factory

---


Executive Summary

Desay Battery Huizhou Factory ("the Factory"), a core supplier to Apple and Huawei, is suspected of systematically violating the EU Market Prohibition Regulation on Forced Labour (Regulation (EU) 2024/3015) and international labour standards. This report exposes:

1. Apple and Huawei's regulatory failures: Despite public commitments to ethical sourcing, both brands' supply chain oversight mechanisms failed to detect and address the Factory's violations.

2. Supply chain joint liability: Under Article 5 of the Regulation, Apple and Huawei must bear equal responsibility for the Factory's misconduct and face proportional penalties.


---


I. Core Violations Against EU Labour Rights Regulations


A. Direct Evidence of Forced Labour

1. Excessive Working Hours

- Statistical Data: 87% of employees recorded >300 monthly working hours (EU legal limit: 176 hours) during January-March 2024 (see Annex 1).

- Systematic Avoidance of Supervision:

- Mandatory "voluntary overtime" without clocking in (12-hour shifts + unofficial overtime daily).

- Sunday overtime compensated at 50 CNY/day in cash (legal requirement: 200% of regular pay).


2. Coercive Management Practices

- Threats to Employees:

- A worker received a verified threat: *"Repost the video and we'll expose your child's school"* (telephonic recording, Annex 2).

- Management decreed: *"Leakers will be terminated without bonus payments"* (meeting transcript, Annex 3).

- Health Crisis:

- A 17-year-old intern suffered acute kidney failure after 28 consecutive working days (medical certificate, Annex 4).


3. Child Labour Risks

- Identity Verification Breaches:

- Labor dispatch agency (Huizhou Zhonghe) hired a 15-year-old using forged ID (case documentation, Annex 5).

- Only 27% of dispatched workers had social security coverage in 2023 (avoiding age verification).


---


II. Applicability of EU Regulations


A. Legal Basis for Joint Liability

1. Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2024/3015:

- Brands supplying components from forced labour facilities shall bear joint and several liability for violations.

- Apple and Huawei's products containing Factory-manufactured batteries risk EU market exclusion.


2. Penalty Mechanisms:

- Default fines: Up to 2× product value for the Factory and its suppliers.

- Targeted Measures:

- Freezing of Apple/Huawei's EU market accounts pending compliance audits.


---


III. Evidence of Apple and Huawei's Regulatory Failures


A. Apple's Supply Chain Governance Deficiencies

1. Policy-Practice Discrepancy:

- CEO Tim Cook's public pledge on "fair supply chains" contrasts with the Factory's ongoing violations.

- Apple's 2024 ESG report awarded the Factory 0/5 for "working hour compliance" without corrective action.

2. Inadequate Audits:

- FLA inspections limited to final assembly stages, excluding primary suppliers like Desay Battery.


B. Huawei's Management Failures

1. Policy Non-Compliance:

- Despite explicit bans on forced labour in Huawei's Supplier Code, the Factory's 60% labor dispatch ratio (vs. Huawei's 10% threshold) persisted.

- Huawei's 2023 audit flagged "deteriorating labour metrics" but lacked public follow-up.

2. Economic Dependence:

- The Factory contributed 18% of Huawei's 2023 battery procurement (¥XX billion), creating conflicts of interest.


---


IV. Local Regulatory Complicity


A. Historical Non-Enforcement

- 2011 Case: The Factory compelled employees to sign "voluntary overtime waivers"; Huizhou HRB only issued rectification orders.

- 2024 Case: Complaints filed on March 10 remain unacknowledged by authorities (postal proof, Annex 6).


B. State-Owned Enterprise Privileges

- The Factory is wholly owned by Huizhou Innovation Investment Co., Ltd. (100% state-funded).

- Contributed 3.2% of Huizhou's industrial tax revenue in 2023, influencing regulatory leniency.


---


V. Action Recommendations


A. Immediate Measures for Apple and Huawei

1. Product Recalls:

- Disclose distribution networks of Factory-supplied components within 48 hours.

- Initiate voluntary recalls for affected products in the EU market.

2. Financial Penalties:

- Pay fines equivalent to 1% of 2023 procurement values (total ~€230 million).

- Suspend EU marketing campaigns until supply chain audits are completed.


B. Systemic Reforms

1. ESG Rating Overhaul:

- Weight "forced labour risk" at 30% in EU procurement evaluations.

- Require annual "Human Rights Impact Assessments" from Apple/Huawei.

2. Multinational Labour Protection Fund:

- Deduct 0.5% of annual revenue for compensation and union development.

- Fund administered by the EESC with penalty revenues.


---


Evidence Annexes

1. Employee attendance records (2024 Jan-Mar)

2. Threat verification materials (call recordings, notarized documents)

3. Medical certificates and workplace injury reports

4. Huawei procurement data and audit reports

5. Government correspondence and tax contribution records


Submitted by:

Date: 11 March 2025

发布于 2025-03-12 04:02・IP 属地尼日利亚
King
自由评论 (0)
分享
Copyright © 2022 GreatFire.org